I’ve been doing a lot of reporting lately, and a lot of interviewing. This is probably good for me, since the fact that I’m a complete misanthrope tends to shut me up in a shell most of the time while I observe people and keep a running narrative in my head about how stupid most of them are. (And isn’t misanthrope such a cool word?)
I have one of those mini-tape recorders that I use during interviews, so I can go back when I’m writing the actual news story and make sure I’ve gotten my quotes right and so forth. The thing’s a lifesaver when you’ve got a half-hour interview which you’ve got to condense into a 600-word story and make sure you haven’t forgotten anything.
One thing I’m beginning to realize, though, is how much power a reporter actually has. Without sounding too cliche, a reporter can really make or break an interviewee.
Obviously, people don’t speak the way they write, and vice versa. A thirty-minute interview is filled with hesitations and backpedaling and back-and-forth between the interviewee and me and so forth. My tapes are filled with “Umm…” and “What I meant to say…” and other conversational detritus that may or may not have anything to do with the story.
What’s amazing to me is how, by carefully choosing what quotes I use, I can paint the person in a totally different way, without misquoting them at all. I can choose to print that they said X, Y and Z, and they’ll look like an angel, or I can choose to print that they said A, B and C and they’ll look like a scum-sucking bottom-dweller, and the reality is that they said all six things - A, B, C, X, Y and Z. I’m just a filter.
I’m still ruminating on the implications of this, but it really suggests to me that when I see somebody quoted in a news story, I need to stop and wonder what else that person said that wasn’t reported.
It also suggests to me that there are three people you need to be nice to: your cook, your bartender, and your interviewer. Any of them can make or break your whole day.

Recent Comments